[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: conversion of bitkeeper archive to tla
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: conversion of bitkeeper archive to tla |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:20:39 -0400 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> You'd have to go back in the list quite a bit (8-12 months), but there
>> was a long discussion about the path length problem on the list. I
>> believe the summary of the thread was that whats really called for is to
>> convince the cygwin guys to use longer NT paths rather than the 256 char
>> paths that are inherited from win9x.
>
> I thought the conclusion was that Arch should really stop using silly
> c/c--b/c--b--v paths and just use c/b/v instead. After all, W32 is not the
You'll draw more flies with honey than with vinegar.
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] conversion of bitkeeper archive to tla, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/08/20