[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again
From: |
mlh |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:58:04 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:38:49PM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> >
> > c-b-v-b0.cpio, c-b-v-p1.cpio, ... c-b-v-cacherev14.cpio, c-b-v-p15.cpio
> > ...
>
> Hmm. I think what you're proposing there would be the first non-pfs
> archive.
Oh is that what I'm doing? :-)
> Tar's semantics are close enough that I wonder whether it could be used
> as a PFS. pfses must support
> file_exists
> is_dir
> file_contents
> get_file
> directory_files
> put_file
> mkdir
> rename
> rmdir
> rm
>
> Off the top of my head, the tricky ones are rename, is_dir, mkdir, rmdir.
I'm very probably too ignorant of pfs to really say,
but I would have any write commands just write to the
tar, then send the whole tar at the close of the pfs
session. (is there such a thing?)
Matt
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Cameron Patrick, 2004/08/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, James Blackwell, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, mlh, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again,
mlh <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Robert Anderson, 2004/08/24