[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:08:10 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Juliusz Chroboczek <address@hidden>
> > > Could you confirm my impression that you haven't seriously looked
at
> > > darcs yet?
> > I'll say "yes" although "I've looked at it selectively" is a more
> > accurate answer.
> I'd like to encourage you to play with it for a while. It contains
> some pretty interesting ideas.
I've never doubted that and, once upon a time, was more familiar with
it than I am at the moment.
The thing is: none of those ideas (that I found, perhaps I missed
something) looked either earthshaking or unadapatable to arch. (Some
of them looked bad, but that's another story). Meanwhile, some stuff
was sorely missing. My conclusion was that if any of those ideas
really do prove to be important, that there would be relatively little
difficulty in finding and implementing the arch analogy of them.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Robin Green, 2004/08/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model [was: the state of the union], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model [was: the state of the union], Tom Lord, 2004/08/30