[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:31:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:08:50PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> When I balance my checkbook, I do the math by hand and double check
> with a calculator: I'm not sure we can expect people to be so
> careful with a centralized "features" table and I'm not sure what
> the "features" equivalent of a calculator (for double checking)
> would be.
I hope I'm understanding the discussion so far, but it sounds like
'features' is a cheap way to announce capabilities that are
programmatically (but expensively) provable.
If that's the case, couldn't your regression tests be your calculator?
If so, then perhaps the inclusion of a regression test that compares
actual behaviour vs. 'features' flag could be a mandatory (or socially
mandatory) prerequisite for any new addition to the features table.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, tomas, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch,
Adrian Irving-Beer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Features command for arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, tomas, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, David Allouche, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, David Allouche, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02