Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] get-changeset with no default archive

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>

    > I would think so.  I'd like to also stick that 'changes' input 
    > validation speedup into the next candidate, now that we have to make one 
    > anyhow.  Thoughts?

I'm with you.   And we can leverage that to even better effect if,
over the next few days, I can cons up a (possibly empty :-) "hit list"
of issues with the last release candidate.

Our goal should be unambiguous, monotonically increasing quality of
GNU Arch releases;  a good *approximation* of that with release
candidates;  encouragement of users who can to help test release
candidates;  and a complete cessation of the supposed "power politics"
crap that I keep trying to put down.

My gosh, if we muster ourselves in that direction, the project might
even start to look a bit .... dare i say it .... professional.

-t