Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] my-revision-library broken (fails to remove non-existent paths)

[Yann Droneaud]

Johannes Berg <address@hidden> writes:

> Archive-URI: http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/archives/address@hidden/
> Base-Revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--patch-25
> Revision: address@hidden/tla--library-remove-fix--1.2--base-0
> Revision: address@hidden/tla--library-remove-fix--1.2--patch-1
> Revision: address@hidden/tla--library-remove-fix--1.2--patch-2
>

You can't update a merge request in a thread like this.
You have to change the subject  with an [UPDATE merge:nn] tag.
(but it seems Bug Boo haven't allocated a merge number, so you have to
start a new thread with the MERGE REQUEST subject to register the merge request)

See:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-09/msg00088.html
And:
http://sherkan.tuxfamily.net/~meuh/arch/bugs.gnuarch.org/www/howto.html
(it's an updated version of http://bugs.gnuarch.org/howto.html)

> On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 22:32 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> Heh. Patch coming up. (Once bug-goo processes this report so I can
>> attach it...)
>
> Done. Writing merge request now, will update with bug-number once bug-
> goo processes (and hopefully knows about jblack's archive then...)
>
> Does it make sense to list the base-0 revision up there?
>

I don't think.

-- 
Yann Droneaud (aka Meuh) <address@hidden>
http://meuh.org/ | http://sherkan.tuxfamily.net/~meuh/
Une vache perdue sur Internet | A cow lost in the Internet
1024D/BEA43321   5D91 B5B0 5137 B8FE 6882  FE19 CAA0 6F05 BEA4 3321