[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:52:50 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Matthew Dempsky <address@hidden>
> Thomas Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Oh, it's monday. Right. We're supposed to conjure up a test
> > candidate this week. Up for it?
>
> Sure. What would you like to be done for it?
Uh... isn't that clear (enough, typos-especially notwithstanding) from
the process spec? Try to follow that and ask me when you get stuck,
please.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal,
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/11/12