[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?
From: |
Aaron Bentley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:49:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309) |
Adrian Irving-Beer wrote:
Any way I can get library-add (in sparse mode, presumably) to add,
say, patch-150 from my archive (a known cacherev) without bothering to
go back through the project's entire lifespan searching for an
ancestor in the library?
This is a pathological case for the way library-add builds revisions.
tla get --no-greedy-add would behave nicely here, because it uses a
different algorithm.
Unfortunately, the only way to fix it is to hack the revision-building code.
And further to that, is there any way (at a later patch, 194 in this
case) to tell a greedy add to stop at that last cacherev (150),
without doing the sparse-150 add above (with or without the extended
ancestry checking)?
I don't think there is.
Aaron
--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.
- [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, John A Meinel, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, John A Meinel, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Robert Collins, 2004/11/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?,
Aaron Bentley <=