[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:54:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:03:33AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
[. . .]
> Things in this set will also inevitably recur (since they don't get
> implemented but people still want to talk about them), so these
> things will be the *most* talked about on mailing lists. Therefore
> the above will be the most common response to people talking about
> missing features.
Good point. For example, maybe I wasn't reading closely enough, but I
didn't hear about i18n at *all* until someone sent a few 'it's done,
code review and translators please' posts.
Yet I hear about binary diff regularly, along with other
recurring themes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Tom Browder, 2004/12/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Thomas Lord, 2004/12/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Stefan Monnier, 2004/12/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Charles Duffy, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/06