[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update
From: |
Ben Finney |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:13:01 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On 06-Feb-2005, Thomas Lord wrote:
> * Tentative Roadmap
> http://www.gnuarch.org/web/communications/gnu-arch-roadmap.html
The roadmap says:
"GNU Arch 1.3.1 15 Mar 2005 -- This will be primarily a
maintenance/rejuvination release of GNU Arch 1.x. Experience has
shown that permitting the baz line to serve as the de facto mainline
for GNU Arch 1.x will be highly problematic."
For those who came in late, can someone point to these experiences (blog
entries? mailing list thread URL?) showing that following baz will be
"highly problematic" for GNU Arch?
--
\ "I'm having amnesia and d�j� vu at the same time. I feel like |
`\ I've forgotten this before sometime." -- Steven Wright |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Thomas Lord, 2005/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update,
Ben Finney <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Ben Finney, 2005/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Robert Collins, 2005/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Ben Finney, 2005/02/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, John A Meinel, 2005/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Tom Lord, 2005/02/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch status update, Miles Bader, 2005/02/06
Message not available