[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2005 08:38:38 +1000 |
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 17:26 -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
> Matthieu Moy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > baz missing removed the "-f, --full" option, and made it the default
> > behavior. While this can be a good thing (I always used -f
> > anyway ...), this makes it inconsistant with other commands displaying
> > revision lists (baz revisions, baz logs, ...).
> >
> > Shouldn't we apply the same change (remove -f and make it the default)
> > to other bazaar commands? (I can do this myself, but I want opinions
> > on this)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> Well, for 'logs' I like having just the patch name, since the rest is
> just clutter. I already know what fully qualified version it is, so I
> don't need it cluttering up the output. I would say the same thing about
> revisions.
>
> I'm not sure why for baz missing, but I wonder if it isn't because it is
> more likely that you will be asking for revisions that are not in your
> current tree. You rarely want to know what is missing from your branch,
> more likely you want to know what someone else has done.
>
> And possible baz is thinking that 'baz missing' (with no options) should
> compare against a parent, or something like that, and they are preparing
> for the change.
We did it for baz missing so that when folk do the fairly natural
thing : baz missing [branch] | baz cat-archive-log, it works. revisions
is much less likely to be piped wholesale, ditto for logs.
That said, it would be nicer to be consistent IMO.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, John A Meinel, 2005/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?,
Robert Collins <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Tom Lord, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Arch revision namespace, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, John A Meinel, 2005/05/24