[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?
From: |
Martin Pool |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:08:09 -0300 |
On 8/21/05, Jan Hudec <address@hidden> wrote:
> To state a more precise definition, Bazaar-NG only allows one head in
> a given tree (each working copy is a branch and vice versa, so I'll call it
> together a tree) at any given time. So if what you pull is descendant of your
> current head, you end up with one head and all is right, but if it isn't, you
> have to merge and commit before doing anything else.
That's correct.
> GIT seems to insist on the merge (allow only one head), but allow to have
> several named branches is one working copy, each of them with it's own head.
> This can serve as a built-in cache of the remote branches. AFAIK Cogito does
> not handle these other branches.
>
> On another side-note, git allows to have arbitrary number of parents for
> a revision, while mercurial allows at most two (at the current state). The
> mercurial folks had to solve this in their git->mercurial gateway some time
> ago.
Our model allows for any number of parents, though I'd expect 1 or 2
to be the most common case.
--
Martin
- [Gnu-arch-users] Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jan Hudec, 2005/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jan Hudec, 2005/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jan Hudec, 2005/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?,
Martin Pool <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Martin Pool, 2005/08/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Martin Pool, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Ollivier Robert, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Ollivier Robert, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/08/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/08/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/22