Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: details, details

[Nikolai Weibull]

Aaron Bentley wrote:

> Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> > Lalo Martins wrote:

> > > (You will notice that Canonical decided to abandon the Arch
> > > codebase in favor of bzr, *after* you announced you'd abandon the
> > > Arch codebase in favor of revc.  Bzr is revc done right.)

> > Man, check the mailing-list archives before writing your FUD.  Arch
> > 2.0 (revc) was announced Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:57:46 -0700, while the
> > first blog entry on the Bazaar-NG blog is dated 2005-02-20.

> Man, check the mailing list before writing your FUD.  As I stated and
> documented yesterday, baz and bazaar-NG were developed in parallel for
> some time before it was decided that bazaar-NG would succeed baz.
> That decision was made this summer.

How do you name a project ‘x-NG’ and not have it in your plan to have it
succeed x?  Are you saying that two projects developed at the same
organisation that implement the same kind of functionality and have the
same name, save a ‘Next Generation’-suffix, were not related to begin
with?,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}