[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...)
From: |
Aldrik KLEBER |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...) |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:18:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 00:12, Matteo Settenvini a écrit :
> If I recall correctly, it's an acronym that stands for "Atomicity,
> Consistency, Isolation, Durability".
>
> It's a useful set of properties of many DBMSes (like Oracle, for
> example), in which you have atomic transactions that can be rolled back
> if aren't executed until the end correctly; transactions don't get one
> in each other's way, and once a transaction has been done, it cannot be
> deleted from history (logs always remain), and this protects you also
> against system failures (because logs can be replayed).
>
> The main goal is to ensure data integrity, among other things.
> I guess journaled filesystems also borrowed the idea.
>
> Regards,
Thank you very much !
Aldrik
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, James Blackwell, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, James Blackwell, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Andy Tai, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, James Blackwell, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Andy Tai, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Matteo Settenvini, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...),
Aldrik KLEBER <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21