[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:36:30 +0900 |
Thomas Lord writes:
> Sorry for the mess but, whatcha gonna do?
Is there a mess? Legally, it's perfectly clear that it's GPLv2-only.
The only legal problem is that if a file gets distributed separately
from the COPYING file, the recipient has no way of knowing her GPL
rights, except to ask the author or a distributor. Big deal, you like
getting mail about your code, no? :-)
It's only a real problem if you want to delegate decisions about the
terms of your license to the FSF. But I thought it was not your
intent to do so at that time.
- [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18