[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `list-of' macro snippet [regarding Comprehensions]
From: |
Rivka Miller |
Subject: |
Re: `list-of' macro snippet [regarding Comprehensions] |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:08:14 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Nov 3, 1:57 pm, Rivka Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 8:09 pm, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Rivka Miller <address@hidden> writes:
> > > This is not that hard.
>
> > > You can take the defmacro comp out of the defun.
>
> > > It should not be hard
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > background info in gnu.emacs.help
>
> > > I spent a few hours poring over and fixed some of the variables and
> > > backquotes and character codes.
>
> > > The defmacro is now only nested in one function where it is needed.
> > > Hope, someone can help get it to work and produce some kind of demo
> > > examples.
>
> > > (defun open-bracket (stream ch)
>
> > > (defmacro comp ((e &rest qs) l2)
> > > (if (null qs) `(cons ,e ,l2) ; rule A
> > > (let ((q1 (car qs))
> > > (q (cdr qs)))
> > > (if (not(eq (cadr q1) '<-)) ; a generator?
> > > `(if ,q1 (comp (,e ,@q),l2) ,l2) ; rule B
> > > (let ((v (car q1)) ; rule C
> > > (l1 (third q1))
> > > (h (gentemp "H-"))
> > > (us (gentemp "US-"))
> > > (us1 (gentemp "US1-")))
> > > `(labels ((,h (,us) ; corresponds to a letrec
> > > (if (null ,us) ,l2
> > > (let ((,v (car ,us))
> > > (,us1 (cdr ,us)))
> > > (comp (,e ,@q) (,h ,us1))))))
> > > (,h ,l1)))))))
>
> > > (do ((l nil)
> > > (c (read stream t nil t)(read stream t nil t)))
> > > ((eq c '|]|) `(comp ,(reverse l) ()))
> > > (push c l))
> > > )
>
> > > (defun closing-bracket (stream ch) '|]|)
>
> > > (eval-when (compile load eval)
> > > (set-macro-character #\[ #'open-bracket)
> > > (set-macro-character #\] #'closing-bracket))
>
> > Why are you repeating this code here in comp.lang.lisp?
>
> > I already told you that it was nonsensical!
>
> > When you put the defmacro for inside the defun, it may not have
> > compile-time effects. Therefore when you compile a file containing
> > brackets, the reader macro function will be called, the macro will be
> > defined, but maybe only into the run-time environment, not into the
> > compilation environment. Therefore the compiler may not know that COMP
> > is a macro, and it may very well signal an error when compiling a
> > bracket expression!
>
> > Why do you insist putting the defmacro inside the defun?
>
> You must have read in a hurry. In previous post, I actually said
>
> >> You can take the defmacro comp out of the defun.
>
> Now, you can take it out and try to run it in emacs and put some run
> examples.
>
> R
I still need someone to help me get the common-lisp comprehension code
working on emacs.