gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNU-linux-libre] venemux contact?


From: Karl Berry
Subject: [GNU-linux-libre] venemux contact?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:49:22 GMT

Is anyone on this list working on venemux, or have recent contact with
anyone from venemux?  rms has been trying to reach them about the
nonfree FAAC and has had no reply ...

Thanks,
karl


Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:54:19 -0400
From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
cc: address@hidden
Subject: No response from Venenux for a long time

There is something nonfree in Venenux; they probably did not realize
it.  But I have had no response to several messages to maintainers.  I
think we need to drop it from the free distros list if we cannot
contact them.

Subject: Re: VENENUX-EC 0.8.2 publicada
To: address@hidden
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> from Richard Stallman
 on Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:55 -0400
From: "No Response Received" <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:12:35 -0400


This message has received no response, and the deadline has passed.
Below is the original message, followed by any referenced messages.

############################### ORGINAL MESSAGE #####################
>From address@hidden  Mon Mar 14 18:33:55 2011
Envelope-To: address@hidden, address@hidden
Delivery-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:55 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:55 -0400
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
 (address@hidden)
Subject: Re: VENENUX-EC 0.8.2 publicada
Reply-To: address@hidden
References: <address@hidden>
 <address@hidden>
 <address@hidden>

[EnviÃ© este mensaje dos veces pero no he visto respuesta ninguna.]

    La licencia de FAAC es engaÃ±osa, dice que es GNU LGPL, pero una lectura
    detenida muestra que contiene partes bajo copyrigth, aunque esta
    informaciÃ³n estÃ¡ bastante escondida, a mi parecer.

Â¿Puedes mostrarme los detalles del problema de FAAC?

Â¿QuÃ© dice Debian?  Â¿Considera que FAAC es libre?
SerÃ­a Ãºtil hablar con el mantenidor del paquete FAAC de Debian
para pedir su ayuda.

Â¿Hay otro librerÃ­a para MPEG2 que pueda usarse?

Â¿SerÃ­a posible usar Cinelerra sin paquete de MPEG2?
Â¿Usando otros formatos como Ogg Theora o Webm?

Â¿Has hablado con los desarrolladores de Cinelerra sobre este asunto?

Tenemos una lista para discusiones entre los equipos de las
distribuciones libres.  SegÃºn una memoria no fiable, puede ser
address@hidden  Â¿Puedes plantear el asunto allÃ­?  Este
problema es importante, necesitamos buscar una soluciÃ³n que mentenga
el uso de Cinelerra y la libertad.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]