Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Time to recheck Chromium?

[Karl Goetz]

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:04:43 +0200
Jaromil <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> hi Brett
> 
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Brett Smith wrote:
>  
> > Is anybody interested in taking a deeper look at Chromium's current
> > status to see if there might be a way to include it now?  I remain
> > loyal to Mozilla-based browsers myself, but I know a lot of users
> > are interested in Chromium, so it would be nice if that was an
> > option free distros could provide.
> 
> 
> I've checked through the list of licenses now comfortably offered by
> the built-in url chrome://credits which is generated by a script in
> the source which can be trusted, AFAIK.
> 
> There are many components and I wouldn't rely on my single analysis
> now, since some details might have slipped through my attention,
> however my outcome is positive, most licenses are BSD, Apache, MIT,
> public domain, Expat etc. plus of course GNU GPL v2 and v3. To me it
> seems there are no proprietary licenses tainting chromium ATM.
> 
> looking forward to more opinions.

For consistency sake, which version did you check? If someone who
doesn't a 2nd look checks a different version you'll get different
results strait off the bat.
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
*** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature