Re: [GNU-linux-libre] CAcert root certificate non-free?

[hellekin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 10/16/2014 07:58 AM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote:
> 
> Still, I will not be adding CaCert's root CA to IceCat or Trisquel as
> they don't seem to be very trustworthy:
>
*** They seem to me more trustworthy than Comodo for example.

Can you expand on the reasons why you think they're not?

A lot of community sites and free software projects use CACert.  I'd
like to hear from CACert assurers about the reasons behind not being
anymore in Debian.

Not everybody needs to buy their peace of mind from a bank, but yes,
everybody needs to have a safe user experience when it comes to SSL
certificates.  I don't think punishing CACert for not complying to
corporate values makes it better for the users on the one hand, nor does
it make it better for the community in general on the other hand to
discard them.  Or did I miss something?

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=gEZr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----