gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version fo


From: Riley Baird
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:08:49 +1000

> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
> 
> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will
> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux',
> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard
> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem.

What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
 
> Otherwise, shouldn't all clauses in our Social Contract be revised under
> a lawyer too? Maybe FSF or Fundatia Ceata (through Tiberiu) could help
> us on it.

Why do you need a lawyer?

Attachment: pgpAGeneKZCzg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]