|
| From: | Luke Shumaker |
| Subject: | Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:39:36 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:34:24 -0400, coadde wrote: > On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > Would you be happy (not feel disrespected) if we were to write the > > following? > > Why are you saying "we"? it is your opinion, not me. You can not speak > on behalf of Parabola devs. "we" the people involved in the Social Contract. What opinion? I was asking if RMS thought it would be a suitable way to word item 4. If everyone liked it, /we/ would write it. It was in a hypothetical--there was no implied consensus yet. -- ~ Luke
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |