[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters

From: Martin Dickopp
Subject: Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 20:30:13 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> FSF's theory of derivative works is total crap.

The FSF licenses simply refer to the definition in coypright law.  Do
you think that referring to copyright law is crap, or do you think that
the definition in copyright law itself is crap?  If the latter, which
jurisdiction(s) do you have in mind?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]