[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:02:15 +0200 |
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:07:08 +0200
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> That's wrong. Linus' "clarifications" apply only to Linus's work
> and no one else's work (unless it's clearly stated by the copyright
> owner).
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:11:24 +0200
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> The kernel is licensed under the GPL without any exceptions.
Parts of the kernel are copyright Linus Torvalds,
thus your second statement is incorrect.
--
Stefaan
--
"What is stated clearly conceives easily." -- Inspired sales droid
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, (continued)
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Ben Pfaff, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?,
Stefaan A Eeckels <=
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/06
- Re: LGPL or GPL+"plugins welcome" ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06