[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:29:36 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Which must be why they were able to force NeXT computers to open their
> Objective C compiler,
You mean Objective-C front-end? They should have simply used plain
old C and the GCC (or whatever) as back-end, like Comeau C++. Well,
http://tinyurl.com/2f96c
<quote>
* I am not distributing "one program", so GPL doesn't apply to me either.
The FSF position would be that this is still one program, which has
only been disguised as two. The reason it is still one program is
that the one part clearly shows the intention for incorporation of the
other part.
I say this based on discussions I had with our lawyer long ago. The
issue first arose when NeXT proposed to distribute a modified GCC in
two parts and let the user link them. Jobs asked me whether this was
lawful. It seemed to me at the time that it was, following reasoning
like what you are using; but since the result was very undesirable for
free software, I said I would have to ask the lawyer.
What the lawyer said surprised me; he said that judges would consider
such schemes to be "subterfuges" and would be very harsh toward
them. He said a judge would ask whether it is "really" one program,
rather than how it is labeled.
So I went back to Jobs and said we believed his plan was not allowed
by the GPL.
</quote>
He and his lawyer (Moglen, I guess) would have been laughed out of
court with such silly "subterfuge" and "one part clearly shows the
intention for incorporation of the other part" arguments.
> Motorola to open their signal processor specific
> variant of gcc
Details?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, (continued)
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/08
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/08
- Message not available
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Tim Smith, 2004/07/07
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/07
- Message not available
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Tim Smith, 2004/07/07
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/08
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/08
- Message not available
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/09
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/08
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/07
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Message not available
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/06