[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software?
From: |
Rui Miguel Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software? |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:11:38 +0100 |
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:49 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> The FSF appeared to make the same point in the
> section "Central Control" of their comments on APSL 1
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/historical-apsl.html However, the
> page http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html had a comment that
> requiring distribution to the original developer if asked is OK. This
> seems inconsistent.
> What have I not understood? What is the flaw in the test? Is there
> external reasoning for the FSD page? References fine. Thanks in advance
> for your time.
Notice the difference between forcing to send upstream, and sending if
asked.
Hugs, Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Message not available
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software?, Martin Dickopp, 2004/07/08