[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software?
From: |
Martin Dickopp |
Subject: |
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:26:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
> [...]
> However, the page http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html had a
> comment that requiring distribution to the original developer if asked
> is OK.
> [...]
If you're looking for the official position of the GNU project, this
newsgroup is probably not the best place to ask. In my experience,
most regulars here are not GNU/FSF officials.
Here's my opinion (IANAG/FO). You are probably referring to the
statement "It is also acceptable for the license to require that, if you
have distributed a modified version and a previous developer asks for a
copy of it, you must send one." This can put a large burden on the
developer; for example, I cannot publish the modification and then throw
the program (and modification) away, instead I have to keep a copy, make
backups, etc, so that I can later fulfill the request. While it doesn't
directly interfere with the four freedoms (IMHO), I still consider it
problematic at best.
Martin
Message not available
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software?,
Martin Dickopp <=
Re: Is forcing "upstream" distribution really OK for free software?, John Hasler, 2004/07/08