Re: Use of GPL'd code with proprietary programs

[Alexander Terekhov]

Martin Dickopp wrote:
[...]
> I don't think dynamic linking was all that common when the GPL was
> crafted; I'm not even sure if it existed at all.  

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b2llt4%24smn%241%40coward.ks.cc.utah.edu
(Subject: Re: "work based on" definition)

[...]
> guts to challenge the FSF's position in court.  

That's ass-backwards logic. 

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8mrevo%243r3%241%40coward.ks.cc.utah.edu
(Subject: Re: Richard Stallman's Politics (was: Linux is awesome!)

FSF should challenge it first. NVidia, Cisco, TiVo, etc. they're all 
waiting. 

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40D170DE.878846D4%40web.de
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40D859F1.9EBF7164%40web.de

regards,
alexander.

P.S. < apropos coward.ks.cc.utah.edu >

http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html