[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:23:39 +0200 |
Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
[...]
> See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Your "maxi-me" (edition 2004) doesn't like PDFs as well. See
<http://www.spinics.net/lists/xf/msg02327.html>.
<quote source=http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
If you send me the plain text, HTML, or PDF, then I could read it.
</quote>
Liar.
regards,
alexander.
- SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Nick Kew, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Paul F. Johnson, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Chris Croughton, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Nick Kew, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Robert Newson, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Linønut, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Hasler, 2004/07/20
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Winters, 2004/07/19
Message not available