[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?
From: |
Jason Clifford |
Subject: |
Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:22:58 +0100 |
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Steve Firth wrote:
> OTOH my legal chum thinks that a correctly constructed license will
> stand up in court. The problem is that anyone wishing to challenge GPL
> or GPL-like licensing will be able to throw more money at it than the
> copyright owner will.
All of these suggestions re invalidating the GPL miss out of a fundemental
fact that is central to the issue:
If the GPL is declared unlawful or unenforcable the only person(s) having
any right to the software is the author(s) and anyone who chooses to
accept the terms as a contract.
Without the consent of the author in such a case anyone who seeks to
distribute (and possibly even use if you believe some commercial abusers
of copyright) the GPL'd product in the course of business is commiting a
criminal offence.
Not too many orgnisations are going to be stupid enough to persue that
course.
Jason Clifford
--
UKFSN.ORG Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net
http://www.ukfsn.org/ ADSL Broadband from just £22.50 / month
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, (continued)
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, John Phillips, 2004/07/19
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, David Kastrup, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Greg Hennessy, 2004/07/20
- Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/07/20