[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN
From: |
Frank Cusack |
Subject: |
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:55:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:19:56 +0200 "UNIX admin" <tripivceta@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> If SUN is going to Open source Solaris, the *only* viable license IS
>> the GPL, for the REASON that all the enterprise code could be put INTO
>> LINUX. Yes, I know that sounds counter-intuitive, but that is the
>> only way Open sourcing Solaris would work, because then the Linux
>> people could port Solaris goodies into Linux and then Linux would run
>> on every expensive highend SUN box.
>
> I hope that doesn't happen, because that would mean taking a perfectly good
> OS and shoving it into a wannabe-UNIX with an identity crisis.
It's already happening (lxrun, and now Janus). How is more compatibility
bad?
/fc
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Rich Teer, 2004/08/23
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, UNIX admin, 2004/08/24
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN,
Frank Cusack <=
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Robin KAY, 2004/08/25
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, John D Groenveld, 2004/08/25
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Christopher Browne, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, McBofh, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, John D Groenveld, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Richard L. Hamilton, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Christopher Browne, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Casper H . S . Dik, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Christopher Browne, 2004/08/26
- Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN, Casper H . S . Dik, 2004/08/26