Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> party in question stop distributing your software in violation of your
> copyright as long as it is not in compliance with the conditions of
> the GPL.

17 USC 109, stupid. It's not a copyright violations to distribute 
lawfully made copies that I own. Thank you for your unilateral 
permission to make copies and for public availability of your work 
all over the net. I don't need another permission to distribute from 
you in addition to "first sale" limitation of your exclusive 
distribution right.

regards,
alexander.