[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
|
From: |
Nicholas R. Markham |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:59:29 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) |
Hmm, that seems to be one "no", one "yes" and one "the question doesn't
make sense." Would any of the respondents care to (a) clarify their
positions or (b) flame each other mercilessly? :)
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:35:53 -0500, Nicholas R. Markham wrote:
> I have a program that I'd like to utilize the GNU Scientific Library.
...
> I'm considering some sort of hybrid approach, where the program in
> question is distributed in two ways: on its own, under the GPL; and in
> the package, under a different license. Would something like this be
> legal? It seems to me that it should, since there is no single program
> that uses the GSL but is not distributed under the GPL.