[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL 3 and patents question
From: |
Claudio Nieder |
Subject: |
Re: GPL 3 and patents question |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:37:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) |
Hi,
>> Section 12 says "if a patent license would not permit royalty-free
>> redistribution by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly
>> through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License
>> would be to refrain entirely from distribution."
>
> He neither needs nor has a license so this does not apply.
It the second part it says: "The sole purpose of this section is to
protect the integrity of the free software distribution system."
I hope it is not understood as absolute protection, but only against
redistributor who wants to restrict source redistribution on purpose
through patent licence they own.
claudio
--
Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg 1, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +41 79 357 6743
yahoo messenger: claudionieder aim: claudionieder icq:42315212
mailto:private@claudio.ch http://www.claudio.ch
Re: GPL 3 and patents question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL 3 and patents question, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/02/03