[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:52:20 +0100 |
> And if you use it internally in a business then you are distributing
> the program to anyone who uses it.
Your opinion differs from that in the GPL FAQ as writtem by the FSF.
I fail to see how it differs. You are still required to follow the
license even if you are only using it internally. I never claimed
that you are forced to distribute your changes to everyone.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/01
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01