[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:31:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:50:13 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
> Quite frankly, I would be surprised if any copyright holder cared
> the least whether I ever got around to annotating source code
> modules that I don't distribute or whether some program on my
> system failed to spit out a no-warranty notice.
>
> The point isn't about caring or not caring, many people license things
> under the GPL and don't care if the work is used in non-free programs.
> It is still a license violation; only that nobody knows about it or
> can prove that it happend.
I note you've skipped to portion of my post where I've pointed out that
the license does not prohibit the activity. My point about caring just
suggests a rational reason why no one has bothered to prohibit the
activity on your own system.
Isaac
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01
Message not availableRe: GPL and other licences,
Isaac <=
Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/02