[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:47:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > And if you use it internally in a business then you are distributing
> > the program to anyone who uses it.
>
> Your opinion differs from that in the GPL FAQ as writtem by the FSF.
>
> I fail to see how it differs.
Then I recommend you actually _read_ the FAQ.
> You are still required to follow the license even if you are only
> using it internally. I never claimed that you are forced to
> distribute your changes to everyone.
<URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistribution>
Is making and using multiple copies within one organization or company
"distribution"?
No, in that case the organization is just making the copies for
itself. As a consequence, a company or other organization can
develop a modified version and install that version through its
own facilities, without giving the staff permission to release
that modified version to outsiders.
However, when the organization transfers copies to other
organizations or individuals, that is distribution. In particular,
providing copies to contractors for use off-site is distribution.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01