[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intellectual Property II

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property II
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:46:16 +0100

David Kastrup wrote:
> If it is from September 2004 and has not been overruled since then, it

Sitecom didn't bothered. So what? 

> would seem like it would have to be printed on _very_ expensive paper
> in order to be worth less than that.

Oh dear. I take it that you agree that the GPL is a contract coupled 
with AGB based on <>.

Yes or no, dak?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]