[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:46:16 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> If it is from September 2004 and has not been overruled since then, it
Sitecom didn't bothered. So what?
> would seem like it would have to be printed on _very_ expensive paper
> in order to be worth less than that.
Oh dear. I take it that you agree that the GPL is a contract coupled
with AGB based on <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedingung_(Recht)>.
Yes or no, dak?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, (continued)
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: First sale according to COPYRIGHT LAW, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/08
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, oaky, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13