[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intellectual Property II

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property II
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:41:33 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> If it is from September 2004 and has not been overruled since then, it
> Sitecom didn't bothered. So what? 

If the issue would have been unimportant to them, they'd have ceded
without waiting for an injunction, wouldn't they?

If the case were as cut&dried in the manner you claim, Sitecom would
have gotten back the legal costs associated with the injunction, once
the stuff would have gone through court properly.

So Sitecom would have been a fool _not_ to bother _unless_ their
chances in court would have been less than favorable.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]