[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:31:37 +0100 |
German GNUtian dak didn't answer "yes or no" question regarding
Welte attorneys (the gang at ifross) wild fantasies that the GPL
is a contract coupled with AGB based on German concept of
conditions subsequent.
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> If it is from September 2004 and has not been overruled since then, it
> >
> > Sitecom didn't bothered. So what?
>
> If the issue would have been unimportant to them, they'd have ceded
> without waiting for an injunction, wouldn't they?
http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/feedback/OIIFB_GPL2_20040903.pdf
-----
The defendant argued: The temporary injunction should be lifted
because the defendant is not liable to be sued. The plaintiff has
no right to sue him.. The defendant is not concerned with the
distribution and/or duplication and/or making public the software
!netfilter/iptables. He, the defendant, is a pure support company,
and is not concerned with selling, reproducing, or making available
the software. He has never undertaken these activities and will
not do so. It has previously been pointed out to the plaintiff that
selling, reproducing and making available software are not
undertaken by the defendant but by the company S[itecom] Europe BV.
Furthermore, there was a notification that the web site had already
been amended. It is obvious that the company [Sitecom] Europe BV
was to clarify the matter and the matter would be clarified by it.
There is therefore no reason to grant preliminary
remedies.
-----
regards,
alexander.
- Re: First sale according to Terekov, (continued)
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, oaky, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/08
Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13