Re: Intellectual Property II

[Alexander Terekhov]

Wallace concludes:

-------
Conclusion

The plaintiff Daniel Wallace in his Complaint has directly or
inferentially alleged that the defendants have:
(1) used an express contractual agreement to conspire with named
co-conspirators and;
(2) engaged in an unreasonable restraint of trade by pooling
intellectual property that is price fixed and distributed at predatory
levels and;
(3) defendants threaten injury to competition as well as causally linked
personal injury to the plaintiff.

Wherefore plaintiff Daniel Wallace moves the Court deny the present
REASSERTED MOTION TO DISMISS filed by defendants RED HAT INC. and NOVELL
INC., and enter judgment for plaintiff Daniel Wallace.
-------

regards,
alexander.