[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intellectual Property II

From: Isaac
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property II
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:22:42 -0600
User-agent: slrn/ (Linux)

On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:03:02 +0100, David Kastrup <> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > What breach?  Distribution of authorized copies fall under first
>>> > sale.
>>> Sure, but there has been no unconditional authorization.  So we are
>>> talking about distribution of unauthorized copies.
>> The act of distribution doesn't turn authorized copies into 
>> unauthorized copies. The act of distribution is totally irrelevant 
>> RE determination whether a copy is authorized or not. So once again,
>> what breach?
> Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional
> authorization.
> It's one of your favorite mistakes.

It's not a mistake.  Preaching the gospel of first sale according to Alexander
appears to be a life mission.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]