[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:36:29 +0100 |
| "Intellectual property"
|
| Publishers and lawyers like to describe copyright as "intellectual
| property"---a term that also includes patents, trademarks, and other
| more obscure areas of law. These laws have so little in common, and
| differ so much, that it is ill-advised to generalize about them. It
| is best to talk specifically about "copyright," or about "patents,"
| or about "trademarks."
|
| The term "intellectual property" carries a hidden assumption---that
| the way to think about all these disparate issues is based on an
| analogy with physical objects, and our ideas of physical property.
|
| When it comes to copying, this analogy disregards the crucial
| difference between material objects and information: information can
| be copied and shared almost effortlessly, while material objects
| can't be.
|
| To avoid the bias and confusion of this term, it is best to make a
| firm decision not to speak or even think in terms of "intellectual
| property".
|
| The hypocrisy of calling these powers "rights" is starting to make
| WIPO embarassed.
If "give" means "making you the owner of the copy", then yes, you
now have a lawful copy of the software and hence copyright law
applies.
Once again, you do not have to be the _owner_ of the CD to be able to
access the content.
Unless you acknowledge that you have grasped this fundamental
difference, I will no longer answer your posts, and consider you a
troll.
Since you have such a fundamentally wrong idea of physical objects
vs. non-physical objects, such a reaction is understandable since you
simply do not acknowledge what property actually is, be it in legal
terms, or even in non-legal terms.
People who resort to name calling are the ones who do not grasp this
`fundamental difference'.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Graham Murray, 2006/02/11
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: GPL and other licences, Graham Murray, 2006/02/11
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/11
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/11
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/06
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/05
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/05