[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:25:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:16:56 +0100, Stefaan A Eeckels <hoendech@ecc.lu> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:22:38 -0600
> Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure whether I agree that you have to own a copy of GPL
>> software to be a licensee
>
> You can indeed obtain a license from the copyright holder without
> owning a copy. A license is an agreement between two parties, and I
> believe that quite often Microsoft Volume licensing deals do not
> include copies of the software.
I did not say that such a thing was generally impossible. The question
is whether the GPL itself provides for becoming a licensee without
making a copy.
Isaac
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Graham Murray, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Isaac <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13