Re: Too late! Window hasta la vista 5308 is now fully operational.

[Liam Slider]

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:04:19 -0800, Karen Hill wrote:

> X-No-Archive:Yes
> 
> The lienux kernel of corn rebels had 5 years of opportunity to take the
> desktop  lead.  They failed.  It is too late now.  vista is done, fully
> feature complete.
> 


Except those vast numbers of features that, you know, they had to cut out
in order to "complete" Vista.


> The FSF movement has lost most credibility to deliver a desktop product.
>  In 2001, they said that their method of producing soft wear over then
> internet with many eyes looking at the code was superiour. Could it be
> true?  

Yes, and they were right.

> The commercial soft wear world was quaking in their boots. 
> Vista was just a gleam in the eye of its creators.  In fact it would
> eventually be rewritten to be based on the Wi n2 k3 code base.
> 
> The Redmond empire was vulnerable.  Anti-trust concent decrees, no new
> os products for 5 years.  This did not look good, the nightmare senario
> of redmond planners and strategists.  If played correctly by the
> opposition, wills worst fears would come to pass.  Yet channel public
> perception, and enough time could be bought so vista could be born to
> the world.  Legions of marketers were summoned and deployed.  Linear
> programming, Markov chains,  graph and game theory were deployed to
> calculate the most effective strategies.  Some of the problems were so
> computationally intensive that there are no computers powerful enough
> could calculate the optimal strategies.
> 
>  Yet when the results were tallied, the FSF is doing WORSE than the bSD
> licensed software projects.  Of note here are the only truly notable and
> remarkable  successful FSF projects: gnom gCC lienux kernel of corn.

Worse? That's not true at all. Linux use outstrips all the BSDs, and the
GPL is far more common than BSD licenced code as far as I know.

> 
> That's it.  Most of the other "free" soft wear is done by bSD or giant
> lizard licensed soft wear.  Here is the common soft wear that the FSF
> likes people to accociate with their model yet bSD pre-dates FSF and is
> totally different.
> A patchy server
> post a guess
> a nice cup of Joe from the coffe house and nice open office etc.


You are so off base it isn't funny Flats.

> 
> These often get confused with FSF and contribute to making the FSF seem
> like a better way to create soft wear.  Yet, a Fruit Co was able to show
> them this was not the case.  2000-2006 will be remembered as the years
> the Fruit Co became successful again in pods to some extent and the
> lienux kernel of corn will just be a footnote in history as an
> unsuccessful idea.

Linux use outstrips Mac use too.

> 
> hasta la Vista will be born at the same time a consent decree expires.
> Gloves come off and the kernel will be eaten for that extra 2% of market
> nutrition.


And yet, nobody cares. Heck, I've heard many Windows users go, "Oh hell
no, I'm switching to Linux!" after hearing about Vista's "features."


> By the way, My Nathans brilliant plan to put  Eunuchs  out of the top
> spot market share in the serving business worked finally after more than
> a decade.  Bet you read about the story in the news! People prefer a
> window to serve with than a Eunuchs now.  How did they do it?  By
> convincing supporters of for pro fit Eunechs creators to go with a free
> lienux.  Just look at the 1999> credits.  Grep them some time.


In other words people were convinced to switch servers to Linux instead of
Unix....rather than Windows. And this is a victory for Windows....how?

> 
> 
> Less biz for the pro fit eunuchs means less RD and less competitive pro
> ducts tape.  Aye eye Ex, hype You Ex, So Lier is, were food munchies
> lienux ate just like Nathan planned.  But then a big blue meanie  took
> the initiative and began feeding  lienux Aye eye Ex and turned the
> tables on My. Nathan.  Totally unexpected action from a Blue meanie. But
> turns out, it worked out for the best as Aye Eye Ex, and the rest were
> feed to Lienex by there makers! How stoopid of them.  Now hasta la vista
> will eat lienex when it needs market food share in 2006.


You have no idea what you are talking about. 

> 
> Dirty Real  Movies (DRM) is already working to make MEdeya Playa the
> only choice.  If you wanna watch a full dirty movie on the net you need
> Medeya Playa and a license to view your dirty movie content.  Dirty
> Movie makers are using it so they stream da movies and all use Medeya
> Playa.  Sure you can get 20 second clips in a mypeg dor mat and who
> wants that?  If you want to watch a private you need MEdeya Playa.

DRM is Digital Rights Management, but you knew that Flatfish. But so
far....Microsoft DRM hasn't bothered me.


So Flatfish....been into tab's crack stash or something? Maybe been
smoking with Bailo?