[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:30:19 +0000
User-agent: tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.35 (i686))

David Kastrup <> wrote on Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:05:44 +0100:
> Alan Mackenzie <> writes:

>> Linønut <=?iso-8859-1?Q?lin=F8nut?> wrote on Tue, 21 Mar 2006
>> 16:54:01 -0600:
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, belched out this bit o'
>>> wisdom:

>>>> (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman,, at his
>>>> request. The "I" below is rms.)

>>> Sure it is.

>> The substance of the message is entirely consistent with RMS's view.  The
>> form of expression is also that of RMS, or at least a good forgery.  I
>> don't know who the poster of the article,, is though.

> Karl Berry is the current president of TUG, the international TeX user
> group.

Ah!  Funny, that's who I first thought of, and compared it some email
I've had from him (to do with the moderation on the Emacs lists), but he
was using a different address for that.  He's an excellent man,

It's strange that RMS hasn't got (or never uses) an NNTP connection,

> David Kastrup

Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: aacm@muuc.dee; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]