Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> [...]
>> Wallace got dismissed because he could not show injury.
>
> Judge Tinder silently ignored Wallace's argument regarding predatory 
> pricing which is central to antitrust injury in Wallace's case. The
> Judge didn't explain why he did it. To me, it appears that he is less 
> versed in antitrust than Wallace.

To you a lot of things appear.  Legal competence necessitates a
certain correlation to what things appear to judges.  And they
apparently have not been raised in Terekhov land.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum