[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:37:05 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> [...]
>> Wallace got dismissed because he could not show injury.
> Judge Tinder silently ignored Wallace's argument regarding predatory 
> pricing which is central to antitrust injury in Wallace's case. The
> Judge didn't explain why he did it. To me, it appears that he is less 
> versed in antitrust than Wallace.

To you a lot of things appear.  Legal competence necessitates a
certain correlation to what things appear to judges.  And they
apparently have not been raised in Terekhov land.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]