[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: denying rights?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: denying rights? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2006 21:15:09 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> If they are the original author, they can add whatever nonsense and
> conditions they want to. Basically, they dictate the license terms.
True.
> However, this software can't be combined with any "normal" GPLed
Not true.
> software, since this would add restrictions to the GPLed software
> against the terms of the licensor from that other software.
How so? Constituents fall under their respective license terms. And
the copyright on original (doctrine of independent creation aside
for a moment) compilation is legally independent from the copyrights
on constituents. Compilations != derivative works. Mere aggregation,
y'know.
regards,
alexander.
- denying rights?, yawnmoth, 2006/05/10
- Re: denying rights?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/10
- Re: denying rights?, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/05/11
- Re: denying rights?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: denying rights?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: denying rights?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11
- Re: denying rights?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: denying rights?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11
- Re: denying rights?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: denying rights?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/11