[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
Gordon Burditt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 May 2006 16:22:49 -0000 |
>The GPL only comes into effect when you distribute. If you do not distribute,
>then the GPL doesn't come into effect.
Then distributing a patch (under a user-hostile license) which
contains none of the content of the original code (most patches are
NOT like this, but some are) cannot be stopped by the GPL.
>Now out of curiosity, what types of modifications (in general terms) would
>you consider making that you wouldn't want to share?
One-off hacks which are embarrassing or not worth the trouble to document.
Gordon L. Burditt
- GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Byron A Jeff, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
Gordon Burditt <=
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/14
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Eric, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/15
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16