[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 17:49:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> Let's try once again, dak.
>
> The judge admits that Wallace alleges predatory pricing and yet
> dismisses "based on failure to allege an anticompetitive effect".
>
> Now, under 12(b)(6) standard, "the court accepts the allegations
> in the complaint as true, and it draws all reasonable inferences
> in favor of the plaintiff."
But there is no substance to be found to support an allegation. For
example, I can allege a person to be a rapist, but if there is no
purported victim, I can't make a case from that.
Just waving some term around does not mean that there is a legal base
for waving the term around.
> Inference of requisite anticompetitive effect from the allegations
> in the complaint is no rocket science -- "predatory pricing has the
> requisite anticompetitive effect" (ARCO).
>
> Where am I wrong, dak?
Where is the anticompetitive effect?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Miles Bader, 2006/05/16
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/18