[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

From: John Hasler
Subject: Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:24:00 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup writes:
> I don't see that they specify the manner of recouping, and I'd consider
> this too narrow for a reasonably effective definition of "predatory
> pricing".

If the defendant would not be likely to raise prices to above what would
otherwise have been the market price, where is the harm to competition?

> Well, nobody claimed that Wallace's suit attempts failed in only one
> respect.

This was discussed extensively on Groklaw.  The complete list is large.
John Hasler
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]